Skip to content

“the single word and two syllables of ‘titwank’ is more euphonious than the staccato polysyllabism needed to describe the action in less ‘vulgar’ language”

November 12, 2009

by Rebecca Attwood
from Times Higher Education

When Alan McKee submitted a paper on pornography to a leading social science journal, he did not attempt to spare readers’ blushes.

But the language he used did more than raise eyebrows: it earned him a ticking-off from the academic referees who reviewed the paper.

“Certain language used in this study is unnecessarily vulgar and unscholarly … eg ‘wanking’ instead of masturbating … ‘tit rubbing’ instead of breast rubbing or fondling … ‘turkey slapping’ and ‘titwanking’,” he was told.

The paper was published after he rewrote it and removed the “rude” words. more

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: